01
Across-the-board cuts
Flat cost targets hit value-adding features as hard as waste.
Structured, data-led value analysis that separates the cost that adds value from the cost that doesn’t — and takes the latter out.
Value engineering is most powerful when it’s driven by data, not workshops alone. We quantify the cost and value of every function and feature, so cost-out decisions protect what customers care about and remove what they don’t.
Blunt cost cuts erode the things customers actually pay for.
Flat cost targets hit value-adding features as hard as waste.
No one can see what each function actually costs versus the value it adds.
Value analysis relies on opinion, not quantified evidence.
Where data sharpens value engineering.
The cost of every function mapped against the value it delivers.
Quantified trade-offs so cost-out protects customer value.
A prioritised, evidenced plan of value-engineering moves.
Evidence-based value engineering.
What each function costs and the value it adds.
Cost-out moves ranked by value protected and saving.
A defensible saving estimate per opportunity.
Bring a real decision or dataset — we’ll show you how KEPLER would approach it, with no obligation.
Book a 60-minute sessionWe start with a short diagnostic — the decision to improve, the data behind it, and a first slice that proves value fast. See how we engage →
From a quick diagnostic to a fully managed service — start small and scale as value is proven. How we engage →
The industries this work serves.
R&D, safety and commercial analytics.
Operational and patient-flow analytics.
Project controls, cost and schedule analytics.
Demand, pricing and customer analytics.
Quality, throughput and maintenance analytics.
From function cost to realised saving.
Product and process are broken into functions and costs.
Each function’s value to the customer is assessed.
Cost that doesn’t add value is surfaced.
Each move is sized into a hard number.
Savings are tracked into the P&L.
Cost removed where it hides, value kept where it counts.
The category, capabilities and expertise this connects to.
Common problems in this area, how KEPLER solves them, and the likely outcome.
~10% cost of goods addressable
View details →A product goes through revision after revision, each one adding a little cost and none taking any out. Eventually the margin is gone, and no one can say which functions the cost actually buys - so every cost-down idea looks like a reliability risk and stalls.
A ranked value-engineering backlog that can be worked in order, with reliability-neutral ideas separated from the ones that need testing. Typically a tenth of product cost sits in the addressable tier.
10–15% variant cost removable
View details →Years of customer-specific tweaks leave hundreds of variants of one product family. The cost of that proliferation is real, but it's buried across separate BOMs, so two 'similar' parts can never actually be compared.
A shortlist of over-specified variants and standardisation candidates, each with cost-to-serve attached, so sourcing can act on the biggest first.
3–5 pts launch margin recovered
View details →Cost modelling shows a new product landing below target margin, and the gap surfaces late - weeks from tooling freeze. After freeze the cost is locked, so the window to change anything cheaply is closing.
Enough reliability-neutral changes identified to close most of the margin gap while the design is still cheap to move.
No use cases match this filter yet — but the problem is almost certainly one we can help with.
Ask us about your problem →Send us a product line and we’ll show you where value engineering pays off.
Talk to our VAVE team
